Are agricultural photovoltaic cells commercially viable?

The idea of combining agriculture with solar energy production might sound like a futuristic concept, but it’s already happening on farms and rural landscapes worldwide. Known as agrivoltaics or agricultural photovoltaics, this approach integrates solar panels with crops or livestock, creating a dual-use system that generates clean energy while preserving farmland. But the big question many farmers, investors, and policymakers are asking is: Does this technology make economic sense today?

Let’s start with the basics. Agricultural photovoltaic (PV) systems involve mounting solar panels above fields at a height that allows farming activities to continue underneath. These setups can range from elevated solar arrays over crops like berries or leafy greens to solar installations in pastures where livestock graze. The panels provide shade, which can reduce water evaporation and protect plants from extreme weather, while the land beneath them remains productive.

From a financial perspective, the viability of agrivoltaics hinges on several factors. First, the cost of photovoltaic cells has dropped significantly over the past decade. For example, companies like photovoltaic cell manufacturers have driven innovations that improve efficiency and durability, making solar installations more affordable. According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the average cost of solar panels has fallen by over 70% since 2010. This price reduction makes dual-use systems more accessible, especially when combined with government incentives for renewable energy.

But it’s not just about the panels. The design of agrivoltaic systems plays a critical role in their success. A well-planned setup can boost crop yields for certain plants. Studies from the University of Arizona showed that crops like chiltepin peppers and cherry tomatoes produced double the yield under solar panels compared to traditional open-field farming. The shade from panels reduces heat stress, conserves water, and creates a microclimate that benefits shade-tolerant crops. For farmers in drought-prone regions, this could translate to lower irrigation costs and more resilient harvests.

Livestock operations also see benefits. Solar arrays on pastures provide shelter for animals, reducing heat stress in cows, sheep, or chickens. This not only improves animal welfare but can also increase milk production or weight gain. In Germany, where agrivoltaics has gained traction, farmers report that sheep grazing under solar panels require less supplemental feed and exhibit healthier growth rates.

However, challenges remain. Upfront costs for installing elevated solar structures are higher than traditional ground-mounted systems. A typical agrivoltaic project can cost 10–20% more due to the need for stronger mounting systems and careful land management. Additionally, not all crops thrive under partial shade. Crops like corn or wheat, which require full sunlight, may not be suitable for these systems. Farmers must carefully select crops or livestock that align with the conditions created by the panels.

Policy and regulation also influence commercial viability. In countries like Japan and France, governments offer subsidies or tax breaks specifically for agrivoltaic projects. These incentives help offset initial costs and encourage adoption. In the U.S., the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) includes funding for clean energy projects, which could make agrivoltaics more attractive to farmers and developers.

Real-world examples demonstrate the potential. In Massachusetts, a 3-acre solar farm combined with blueberry bushes generates enough electricity to power 150 homes while producing marketable fruit. In Italy, a vineyard uses solar panels to protect grapes from hailstorms, reducing crop losses by 30%. These success stories highlight how tailored solutions can turn agrivoltaics into a win-win for energy and agriculture.

Looking ahead, advancements in solar technology and smarter system designs will likely improve the economics of agrivoltaics. Transparent solar panels, for instance, could allow more sunlight to reach crops while generating energy. Researchers are also exploring dynamic mounting systems that adjust panel angles based on weather or crop needs.

For now, agrivoltaics isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution, but it’s a promising option for farmers looking to diversify income streams and contribute to renewable energy goals. As costs continue to decline and more data emerges from pilot projects, the business case for combining solar power with agriculture will only strengthen. The key is balancing innovation with practicality—ensuring that these systems work for both the land and the people who depend on it.

Leave a Comment